Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S AMBALA STONE CRUSHER AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on CaseMine. ... He has also submitted that same notification issued on 10.02.1988 was the subject matter of adjudication before the Supreme Court in A.P. Pollution Control Board II v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu (Retd.) and Others (2001) 2 SCC 62. He ...
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
4. Learned counsel for respondent no. 9 further submits that the site in question is beyond one kilometer from the boundary of Rajaji National Park, therefore, no norm or guidelines is violated by establishing stone crusher there. He relies upon the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
13. This amounts to violation of various directions issued by this Court in its judgment dated 16-12-1983 in Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984) 3 SCC 161 and judgment dated 13-8-1991 in Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1991) 4 SCC 177. The State Government of Haryana may consider the feasibility of cancelling the leases of ...
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
in the supreme court of india. civil appellate jurisdiction . civil appeal no. of 2023 (@ diary no. 4169/2023) m/s shri ram stone crusher & ors. appellant(s) versus. the state of haryana & ors. respondent(s) with. civil appeal no. 910 of 2023. civil appeal no. of 2023 (@ diary no. 4899/2023) civil appeal no.956 of 2023
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Court with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, very humbly prayed that this Honourable Court may graciously be pleased to issue directions to the respondents that they may halt the illegal …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
We thus are of the view that judgment of Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dated 27.04.2005 in Kumar Stone Works deserved to be approved and judgment of Uttarakhand …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Writ Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed to pass …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. The challenge in these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the endorsements dated 28th December 2018 at Annexures-A and B. By the impugned endorsements, the applications made by the petitioner …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
2. The contention of the petitioner is that the said revisional order does not contain any reasons and as such the same is violative of principles of natural justice and requires to be set aside. The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Kumaon Stone Crusher _____ Respondent. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004, decided on February 19, 2015 (With appln. For impleadment as party respondent and c/delay in filing counter affidavit and exemption from filing O.T., and modification of …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
19445/2004 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-07-2004 in WP No. 1124/2001 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) STATE OF …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
3 This petition was based upon the judgment rendered by Seven- Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in India Cement Ltd. and ors. vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors. (19901) 1 SCC 12, wherein it was declared that royalty itself is a tax.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
The Hon'ble Supreme Court on 25.7.2024 & on 14.8.2024, reiterated by following its own Judgments that; "The royalty is a consideration paid by a mining lessee to the lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights" 2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court overruled the following judgments, which held that Royalty is a Tax. India Cements v.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
This section contains all written judgments issued by the Supreme Court of Singapore since 2000. Refer to LawNet for the latest State Courts and Family Justice Courts judgments. Try the AI Pair Search prototype for Supreme Court judgments. Share this page: Facebook. X. Email. Print. Singapore Courts. Self-help guides. Criminal;
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Anantdeep Singh Vs. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh: 06/09/24: Dharmendra Sharma Vs. Agra Development Authority: 06/09/24: Mandakini Diwan Vs. The High Court of Chhattisgarh: 06/09/24: Chirag Bhanu …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
As noticed above, the Supreme Court has upheld the validity of Rule-38A. 81. Sri. S.G. Hasnain, learned Senior Advocate has placed reliance on a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Vatika Township Private Limited (supra). The said case …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Sr. No. Case Subject Case No Case Title Author Judge Upload Date Judgment Date Citation(s) SCCitation(s) Download
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
JUDGMENT/ORDER 1. Rule. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally, with the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. By means of this Petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dtd. 20/12/2022 (Exh.19) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Khamgaon in Summary Criminal Case No.694/2022 thereby allowing the application filed by …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
abhijeet kumar @ ajay kumar @ ajay rai @ ajay rai patnawala vs. the state of bihar - slp(crl) no. 929/2025 - diary number 57978 / 2024 - 21-feb-2025
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
By means of this Petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dtd. 20/12/2022 (Exh.19) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Khamgaon in Summary Criminal Case …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Supreme Court of India State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 September, 2017 Equivalent citations: AIR 2017 SC (SUPP) 355, 2018 (14) SCC 537, (2017) 11 SCALE 651, 2017 (4) KLT SN 74 (SC) ... The High Court in its judgment has noticed details of few of the writ petitions facts of only leading petition which need to be briefly ...
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
State Of Uttaranchal And Others v. Kumaon Stone Crusher . The High Court had previously held Rule 5 to be constitutionally valid but invalidated the levy of transit fee due to the absence of …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
above conclusion of the High Court has already been noticed from paras 9 and 10 of the judgment of the High Court giving rise to Civil Appeal No. 2608 of 2012. 37. The High Court having come to the conclusion that the Enquiry Officer has acted as prosecutor also, the capacity of independent adjudicator was lost while adversely affecting his ...
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
The Hon‟ble Supreme Court vide its Judgement dated 24th March 2023 in SLA No. 5563/2023 upheld the Judgement of Hon‟ble NGT and directed ... Crusher and WP(C) 31869/2016. 6. The instructions forwarded vide letter dated 3.06.2023 shall be revised accordingly.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Further, the High Court also held that Article 31C of the Constitution bars any challenges on the grounds of Articles 14 or 19, if the statute has been enacted in furtherance of Article 39(b). The petitioners moved the Supreme Court. As the case lay pending, in 2019, subsequent amendments to the MHADA precipitated a new set of challenges.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Get free access to the complete judgment in Anjani Stone Crusher... v. State Of Andhra Prad... on CaseMine.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
On October 9, 2023 the Supreme Court of India has rendered its judgment settling the law on issues debated for past 15 (fifteen) years related to captive generation and use of electricity as also exemption of surcharges. ... On …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
This court vide its judgment dated 8.12.2009 quashed and set aside the order dated 22.7.2009 and remitted the matter to the State Board for deciding the matter afresh. The petitioner …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
After referring to various decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court while deciding an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act arising out of the dismissal of an application filed under Section 16 (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation 13/17 / Act questioning the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal which is on ...
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Judgment of Rajasthan High Court dated 27.9.2022─Not valid due to overlooking of Stay granted by Supreme Court─With due respect, I write to state that the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court on 27.9.2022 has given their judgment based of order dated 24.10.2017 in the case of Udaipur Chambers of Commerce and Industry v.
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
State Of Uttaranchal Petitioner (S) v. Kumaon Stone Crusher (S). | Supreme Court Of India | Judgment | Law | CaseMine. CASE NO. Petition (s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004, [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/07/2004 in WP No. …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Get Solution & Price Right Now! leave your message here, we'll send you an Email immediately. * *
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
We are adverting to the facts of Writ-C No. 14286 of 2019, Sunrise Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of U.P., and it is treated as lead petition. 3. The relevant facts, as stated in the lead …
WhatsApp: +86 18221755073